Peer Review Process

JIRTES: uses a double-blind review policy, where the identities of authors and reviewers are hidden until the submitted article is published.

Research articles submitted to this online journal will be reviewed by a minimum of 2 (two) reviewers. Accepted research articles will be available online after the journal's peer-review process. The language used in this journal is English or Indonesian.

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality, and often authenticity of articles for publication. The main goal is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out articles that are invalid or of low quality.

From a publisher's perspective, peer review serves as a content filter, directing better quality articles to better quality magazines and thereby creating the magazine's brand.

Running an article through a peer review process adds value to the article. Therefore, publishers need to ensure that peer review is robust.

The best peer review.

What peer review does best is improve the quality of published papers by motivating authors to submit good quality work and helping improve that work through the peer-review process.

Each submitted article will be evaluated based on:

1. Originality of contribution in the field of scientific publications; the accuracy of the theory and methodology provided on the topic; consistency of the analysis; his ability to communicate with readers (grammar and style); and the writing format is in accordance with the journal submission guidelines.
2. The normal rotation time for examination and evaluation of manuscripts is 1 to 2 months from the date of submission. For example, a paper received by an editor will be sent to the section editor according to its field in about one day. 3. Then the part editor will analyze for 10 days. 4. The section editor will submit it into 2 reviews with a one month budget. The results obtained will be notified to the author one day after the reviewer's conclusions are summarized.